![]() I’m not saying he shouldn’t be given the opportunity to play, but I don’t see any way he would be starting in the league. Which team is required to sign Colin for roughly $20 million too be a back up QB? Even if he still can play, who is going to trust their starting QB position to a QB whom hasn’t started in 3 years? I honestly don’t see how he will be signed by any team unless it is a publicity role and definitely not as a starter. Their currently many former starting QBs free agents that have not been signed. Other teams already have QBs either were on the team during the 2019 season, drafted, traded for or signed as a free agent this year. The Redskins do not need to sign another QB nor waste the salary cap funds. That has the team currently carrying 4 QBs. We also have a former starting QB on the IR and we signed a undrafted QB basically for the Practice squad. The back-up we traded for from Carolina Panthers which cost a draft pick. The starting QB was a 1st round pick a year ago. So to those of you who resent or otherwise disagree with our ongoing effort to get someone/anyone to do the right thing, make sure you take a page from the Mike Gundy pre-mullet playbook and get your facts straight. ![]() More recently, the Associated Press floated the notion that Kaepernick may have a bigger platform by not playing than if he returned to the league, a laughable notion that feels like a favor fed to a league that hopes the heat will leave the kitchen before the stove explodes. We listed several of them in May 2017, from Kaepernick demanding $9 million to $10 million per year to demanding a chance to compete for the starting job to his vegan diet (while Tom Brady does the same thing) to the inaccurate notion that Kaepernick would prefer to do social justice work over playing football to the broad-brush proclamation that Kaepernick was unsigned because, as Albert Breer of SI.com claimed in 2017, “e’s not considered a starting-caliber player by any NFL evaluator anymore” - a simultaneous deep dive into the mind of every single talent evaluator employed by every NFL team. Last October, agent Jeff Nalley issued a fact sheet addressing many of the false narratives. battle regarding the shunning of Colin Kaepernick. Other false narratives have been used by teams and/or the league office, with the media serving as a willing conduit, to win the P.R. (Meanwhile, Osweiler was offered a contract in 2017, a year after spurning the Broncos for the Texans.) Then, once he became a free agent in 2017, the Broncos showed no interest, arguing basically that he had his chance to sign with the team in 2016. The Broncos considered trading for Kaepernick in 2016 (after the retirement of Peyton Manning and defection of Brock Osweiler to Houston), before Kaepernick ever protested during the anthem, but he declined to reduce his guaranteed salary to facilitate a trade. Some have argued that Kaepernick rejected an opportunity to sign with the Broncos since becoming a free agent in March 2017. As NFLPA executive director De Smith likes to say, you’re entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts. ![]() ![]() Fourth, no team has invited him for a workout. Third, he has had only one visit since becoming a free agent in March 2017, with the Seahawks later that year. Second, Kaepernick has received no offers of employment since becoming a free agent in March 2017. John Lynch said so, emphatically, on PFT Live. First, the 49ers would have cut Colin Kaepernick if he hadn’t opted out of his remaining contract with the 49ers. Most contain key factual errors regarding Kaepernick’s experiences since becoming a free agent in March 2017.įor starters, it’s important to remember a few things. Given our support for the return of Colin Kaepernick to the NFL, a sports league that has wrongfully denied him employment for more than three years, plenty of negative and/or hostile emails have arrived in recent days.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |